I was wondering what everyone else thinks about edits to a recipe and at what point you no longer have to give credit to the source. I often massage a recipe changing the ingredients and the method.
According to copyright law, you can't copyright a formula, but the procedure (instructions) can be, and a compilation of formulas can be. So, if you changed the ingredients to metric measures, but copy the procedure, you should give credit. So, technically, if I take someone's recipe, and adapt it to using a ThermoMix, I've changed the instructions, and I'm ok. But that seems to bother me. I think that if I've changed an ingredient or two, or how much used, and I alter the procedure, such as mixing all the wets together first, while the original specifically did one ingredient at a time, and I add pictures, it's pretty well mine, even though I based it on someone else's recipe.
What do you think?
According to copyright law, you can't copyright a formula, but the procedure (instructions) can be, and a compilation of formulas can be. So, if you changed the ingredients to metric measures, but copy the procedure, you should give credit. So, technically, if I take someone's recipe, and adapt it to using a ThermoMix, I've changed the instructions, and I'm ok. But that seems to bother me. I think that if I've changed an ingredient or two, or how much used, and I alter the procedure, such as mixing all the wets together first, while the original specifically did one ingredient at a time, and I add pictures, it's pretty well mine, even though I based it on someone else's recipe.
What do you think?